W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: Implicit close of idle streams

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:34:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXh9VkzQyFBYnWNncKOO7BpDqnzDtRerZxFYjiYwbnyHw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gábor Molnár <gabor.molnar@sch.bme.hu>
Cc: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org>, Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 20 August 2013 06:52, Gábor Molnár <gabor.molnar@sch.bme.hu> wrote:
> so opened a new one here: https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/236

This is not specific to PUSH_PROMISE, it's a general race.  Thus, we
need more text (bleargh) to deal with the fact that a sender could
receive RST_STREAM after sending END_STREAM.
Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2013 16:34:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:14 UTC