W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: http methods

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 09:42:23 +0000
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
cc: (wrong string) ™ˆ™˜Œ)" <willchan@chromium.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5338.1376646143@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <520DEE67.7000908@gmx.de>, Julian Reschke writes:
>On 2013-08-13 13:06, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> In message <520A112B.7010200@gmx.de>, Julian Reschke writes:
>>> On 2013-08-13 09:37, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>
>>> I believe what you say is based on the point of view of a very specific
>>> component.
>>
>> I say this from the perspective I hold on HTTP/2.0:
>>
>> 	  1 Tbit/s per machine or it doesn't matter.
>
>Again: what does this have to do with the size of the vocabulary?

It has something to do with how much work you have to do to find
out how to treat/route a request.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Friday, 16 August 2013 09:42:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:14 UTC