W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: incrementally indexed headers should be inserted in index '0' instead of len(table)+1

From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 15:22:21 -0700
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNcQrNwAb2D8FWYEAZd7U6DFy-Pz4-pd89o63eiiqTK66Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
The point is to not reference it again, except to remove it or add it to
the reference set.
This actually happens often enough that the size of the representation of
the index causes a decent increase in the on-the-wire size.

-=R


On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 15 August 2013 15:08, Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com> wrote:
> > isn't the point of delta-compression not to reference the entry again?
>
> That's exactly my point.  :method is probably more interesting in that
> regard.
>
Received on Thursday, 15 August 2013 22:22:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:14 UTC