W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: HTTP/2.0 wireshark dissector

From: Ludin, Stephen <sludin@akamai.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 15:21:29 -0500
To: William Chan (Dz) <willchan@chromium.org>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Hasan Khalil <hkhalil@google.com>
CC: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CE31340F.49533%sludin@akamai.com>
Indeed.  Hasan and I discussed this at the interim, though it was late into the dinner so I will not be held accountable to recalling the details.  In essence I remember committing to taking a swag at it and then seeing where things could be combined.


From: "William Chan (Dz)" <willchan@chromium.org<mailto:willchan@chromium.org>>
Date: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 1:15 PM
To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com<mailto:grmocg@gmail.com>>, Hasan Khalil <hkhalil@google.com<mailto:hkhalil@google.com>>
Cc: Stephen Ludin <sludin@akamai.com<mailto:sludin@akamai.com>>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org<mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org<mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>>
Subject: Re: HTTP/2.0 wireshark dissector

+hasan who has worked on the SPDY dissector which should look somewhat similar. Perhaps there's room for collaboration?

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com<mailto:grmocg@gmail.com>> wrote:

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Ludin, Stephen <sludin@akamai.com<mailto:sludin@akamai.com>> wrote:
I took a swing at pulling together a HTTP/2.0 dissector for wireshark:


It does the basics a this point but there is certainly room for
improvement.  If anyone has good wireshark dev experience and wants to
contribute you are extremely welcome.



Received on Wednesday, 14 August 2013 20:22:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:14 UTC