- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 10:54:40 +0000
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- cc: "William Chan (???)" <willchan@chromium.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <520A0F06.5090901@gmx.de>, Julian Reschke writes: >Removing uncommon methods doesn't simplify HTTP any more then removing >uncommon status codes or header fields. Can you please explain what the word "simplify" means to you ? If ditching a load of unnecessary bells and whistles reduces the size of the specification by 10%, it would clearly count as a simplification where I come from. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2013 20:32:44 UTC