- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 00:32:00 +0100
- To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 13 August 2013 00:11, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote: > If the END_HEADERS flag is not > set, we ought to allow frame sizes up to the maximum allowed (65,535) > to eliminate this additional overhead. Interesting observation. Would you make the same allowance for HEADERS and PUSH_PROMISE too? Those are actually more likely to need this. That said, I'm not certain that I want this, it seems like an another set of if() statements that could be avoided. After all, we determined that the framing overhead was tolerable. And it's not like we want to *encourage* the use of big headers.
Received on Monday, 12 August 2013 23:32:28 UTC