W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: [#228] PUSH_PROMISE with CONTINUATION can end a stream

From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 15:54:32 -0700
Message-ID: <CABP7Rbd+ppJtPFd63jJM52mzx=oyGm+96ZGVs8ZronbWMt+rzA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
I see no reason at all why PUSH_PROMISE can't have END_STREAM.

On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Martin Thomson
<martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/228
>
> PUSH_PROMISE does not have an END_STREAM flag.
>
> However, a sender might emit a PUSH_PROMISE followed by a CONTINUATION
> with the END_STREAM set. As specified, this ends the stream.
>
> I think that we need to either prohibit this, or we add END_STREAM to
> PUSH_PROMISE.  I don't care which.  Bike shed... go!
>
Received on Monday, 12 August 2013 22:55:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:14 UTC