- From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 15:54:32 -0700
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
I see no reason at all why PUSH_PROMISE can't have END_STREAM. On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/228 > > PUSH_PROMISE does not have an END_STREAM flag. > > However, a sender might emit a PUSH_PROMISE followed by a CONTINUATION > with the END_STREAM set. As specified, this ends the stream. > > I think that we need to either prohibit this, or we add END_STREAM to > PUSH_PROMISE. I don't care which. Bike shed... go! >
Received on Monday, 12 August 2013 22:55:19 UTC