W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: CONTINUATION frame and continuation flag

From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 08:52:57 -0700
Message-ID: <CABP7RbdS1YNX4iSOg+EB6jL-b65VGsCLS==rcgqPLew=OBHp1A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
+1 ...

On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6 August 2013 15:33, David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com> wrote:
>>
>> Keep the binary value for the flags the same ... either all last/end=1 or
>> all more/continued=1. I prefer the former value, but not very strongly.
>
> Yes, we agreed to this before and I don't think it's worth backsliding
> on this one.  END_CONTINUATION >> NOT_DONE_YET.
>
Received on Tuesday, 6 August 2013 15:53:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:14 UTC