- From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 14:13:38 -0400
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <51F953D2.8060708@bbs.darktech.org>
On 31/07/2013 1:37 PM, Eliot Lear wrote:
> And this brings me to my general concern. Stop running away from
> normative language. This WG is writing a specification that is
> intended to be very widely deployed. It is intended to supplant the
> most widely deployed application protocol ever, and therefore
> interoperability and deterministic behavior is important. So is the
> use of standard well-known normative terms. They are carefully
> defined with specific meanings that are well known that most
> programmers understand. They are *so* well known that many standards
> organizations have adopted them.
>
> Lastly, these words are contained in a voluntary standard. If you
> don't follow them, the IETF believes that you may have an
> interoperability, performance, or security problem, and in some cases
> you might cause problems for others.
>
> Eliot
>
+1
Gili
Received on Wednesday, 31 July 2013 18:14:10 UTC