- From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 14:13:38 -0400
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 31 July 2013 18:14:10 UTC
On 31/07/2013 1:37 PM, Eliot Lear wrote: > And this brings me to my general concern. Stop running away from > normative language. This WG is writing a specification that is > intended to be very widely deployed. It is intended to supplant the > most widely deployed application protocol ever, and therefore > interoperability and deterministic behavior is important. So is the > use of standard well-known normative terms. They are carefully > defined with specific meanings that are well known that most > programmers understand. They are *so* well known that many standards > organizations have adopted them. > > Lastly, these words are contained in a voluntary standard. If you > don't follow them, the IETF believes that you may have an > interoperability, performance, or security problem, and in some cases > you might cause problems for others. > > Eliot > +1 Gili
Received on Wednesday, 31 July 2013 18:14:10 UTC