Re: NEW ISSUE: Define "ought to"

On 7/31/2013 7:00 AM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 31 July 2013 06:41, Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net> wrote:
>> Well, the choice of non-normative vocabulary would do better to be for words
>> and phrasing that are not too easily confused with the normative terms.
>> Cognitive separation will help the reader.
>
> I believe that RFC 6919 covers a lot of this ground already.


Alas, if only they'd meant the document seriously...

d/


-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

Received on Wednesday, 31 July 2013 05:20:05 UTC