- From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 18:08:41 -0400
- To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- CC: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 30/07/2013 5:45 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> I'd say that "ought to" here in the HTTP spect is generally a good friend's
> advice from some other implementors that got trapped and know how to avoid
> this. There's nothing normative in what follows "ought to" so those who
> won't follow it will not cause harm and might only suffer themselves.
> SHOULD is a MUST with an exception if you know you can safely ignore it.
That is an excellent explanation. Please consider adding it to
section 1.1.
Thanks,
Gili
Received on Tuesday, 30 July 2013 22:09:15 UTC