- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 21:57:11 +0200
- To: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
- CC: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2013-07-30 21:43, Mike Bishop wrote: > If I'm following you correctly, this could be restated: > > ·“MAY” – Strictly at your discretion based on what matters to you > > ·“ought to” – Or your implementation will be less effective/efficient > than it could be, without hurting anyone else > > ·“SHOULD” – Or your implementation will cause peers / the network to > suffer for your stupidity > > ·“MUST” – Or you won’t be able to interoperate with anyone Almost. Violating an "ought to" may hurt others, jusr not in the way BCP14 says. Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 30 July 2013 19:57:41 UTC