W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS=0 and PUSH_PROMISE

From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:38:02 -0700
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNfgEqP2dwHsG0RD2ZizpVNw=98mTJ=1Q33b3UK8NdhjYA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>, Gábor Molnár <gabor.molnar@sch.bme.hu>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
I'm a proxy guy, actually.
I have to deal with both sides constantly, except that I'm more memory,
CPU, and bandwidth constrained. It is true that I don't have to deal with
rendering, however.

-=R


On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 23 July 2013 15:21, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> We've done a lot to protect resources on a server, but I don't think
> >> that a client is able to limit the commitments it has to make in order
> >> to continue to use a connection.
> >
> > Given the above, do you still feel that way? :)
>
> You're a server guy.  That mostly just reads like a "it's clients, who
> cares, they can deal with it".  I'll hold my opinion until the client
> folks reply.
>
Received on Tuesday, 23 July 2013 22:38:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:14 UTC