W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: HTTPS 2.0 without TLS extension?

From: (wrong string) 陈智昌 <willchan@chromium.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 11:57:20 -0700
Message-ID: <CAA4WUYiA5A2pnqMOrntb-B_uGQRBAGeaAAf8ELtBmHhCzan63Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
I find your argument for mandating HTTP Upgrade to HTTP/2.0 over TLS
uncompelling. If others find it compelling, I would be interested in
hearing so.


On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Therefore if the spec allows TLS-Upgrade, it might as well mandate it.
>
> I mean, "it might as well mandate all compliant implementations to
> support the Upgrade mechanism on a TLS connection"
>
Received on Tuesday, 23 July 2013 18:57:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:14 UTC