- From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 00:24:52 +1200
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- CC: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 16/07/2013 4:51 a.m., Martin Thomson wrote: > On 15 July 2013 06:01, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote: >> I think this particular section 3.5 needs a second explicit note to the >> effect that the opaque blob should be adjusted for the draft-specific >> identifier. > The intent was always the precise opposite here. That magic string > isn't a string, it's just a sequence of octets. It should NOT be > adjusted. > > For one, we don't have any indication that it would be as effective if > it were to be changed. Ah. Thank you. Okay I will code up the HTTP/1.1 agent to expect those exact octets. I still think there should be a second temporary note to clarify that intention for the drafts so long as the section 3.1 special note exists. Amos
Received on Tuesday, 16 July 2013 12:25:24 UTC