- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 18:43:20 +0000
- To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- cc: Sam Pullara <spullara@gmail.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <20130713173222.GM32054@1wt.eu>, Willy Tarreau writes: >On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 09:49:42AM -0700, Sam Pullara wrote: >I'm sorry, but cookies are *not* evil. Cookies are not evil, but they cause problems which HTTP/2.0 does not need to cause. "Automatic EU Cookie directive compliance" would be a really great selling point. >We could possibly support very short cookies (eg: 16 bit). That should be >enough for most large deployments, and clearly not enough to track users. I think it is smarter to both solve the cookie and session problems with a single field. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Saturday, 13 July 2013 18:43:46 UTC