W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: Alternative Header Compression Update..

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:52:58 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXp_CweVq=JciqCc1YEHHBkijQCPtNhLtN3ZkAb4QWqRA@mail.gmail.com>
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Cc: RUELLAN Herve <Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 11 July 2013 10:32, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, looking at Indexed references currently, the 256-entry table
> means that every index position can be represented using a single
> octet. If we represent each entry separately that means we would end
> up always using two bytes to represent index positions > 127.

That's not valuable information until I know the typical table size
that I might like to maintain.  127 actually seems like a pretty big
number to me.
Received on Thursday, 11 July 2013 17:53:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:14 UTC