- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 11:36:34 +0200
- To: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
- CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2013-07-03 21:16, cowwoc wrote: > Hi, > > Now that status code 303 and others no longer imply GET, we need to > ... How so? 303 always implied GET. 301, 302, and 307 never implied GET. The only change we made is to allow 301 and 302 to rewrite POST to GET (because that's what UAs do). Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 4 July 2013 09:37:07 UTC