W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: HTTP/2.0 -04 candidate

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 12:55:42 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUc97SbC+mqpsjwivWLa=_1NBfTfswBPtGCgO65=QPeDQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Cc: Sam Pullara <spullara@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2 July 2013 12:51, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, there are cases where the mechanism spec'd in SPDY today is suboptimal.
> That seems like a poor reason to reject it, however, when the alternative is
> guaranteed suboptimality.

That's true, the coalescing that SPDY does won't work 100% of the
time, but the times where it does work will make (most) things better.
 If by better you mean fewer connections - and we're fairly sure that
is actually better.
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2013 19:56:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:14 UTC