As far as I remember, yes, this should be changed. Pushed streams have to be closed separately...that's why associated_only was suggested. On Jul 2, 2013 9:04 AM, "Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2 July 2013 08:42, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> wrote: > > I thought previous on-list discussion had agreed to remove this tie > between stream lifecycles and just send a stack of RST_STREAMs in a single > packet if need be. Is that still the consensus? > > Mark? > > I can't remember the state of this one. I know that we discussed this > a couple of times, on-list and at-interim, but I don't recall a solid > conclusion. (There might have been a weak conclusion.) > > See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2013AprJun/1115.html > >
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2013 16:22:06 UTC