W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: HTTP/2.0 -04 candidate

From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 09:21:38 -0700
Message-ID: <CABP7RbfNZTs-KnRK4PtunHE+jmh9PwpGpDx1QA+ADyVqdZLTjg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
As far as I remember, yes, this should be changed. Pushed streams have to
be closed separately...that's why associated_only was suggested.
On Jul 2, 2013 9:04 AM, "Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 2 July 2013 08:42, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> wrote:
> > I thought previous on-list discussion had agreed to remove this tie
> between stream lifecycles and just send a stack of RST_STREAMs in a single
> packet if need be.  Is that still the consensus?
>
> Mark?
>
> I can't remember the state of this one.  I know that we discussed this
> a couple of times, on-list and at-interim, but I don't recall a solid
> conclusion.  (There might have been a weak conclusion.)
>
> See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2013AprJun/1115.html
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2013 16:22:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:14 UTC