Re: [#153] PUSH_PROMISE headers

On 30 June 2013 20:51, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote:
> There does seem to be an interesting case for RST_STREAM+If-Not-Modified
> here to optimize bandwidth usage.

I don't think that we need to standardize this, but servers could just
include If-Match in their PUSH_PROMISES.  Then clients have an etag
upon which to base their RST_STREAM decisions.

Of course, that would depend on the server wanted to encourage clients
to send RST_STREAM.  No point encouraging RST_STREAM if it's only ever
going to arrive late.

Received on Monday, 1 July 2013 23:38:14 UTC