- From: Adrien W. de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 02:53:36 +0000
- To: "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <emb5f097c8-6b75-4e69-ad9b-0cbd43dd6855@bodybag>
Just been working on range support. P5 is great improvement over 2616 btw, answers a lot of questions. some nits and queries... 1. 3.1 Range: Para 4 (p7) A proxy MAY either discard a Range header field that contains a range unit it does not understand or pass it to the next inbound server when forwarding the request. What does "next inbound server" mean? Range is a request header, therefore these should only be going in 1 direction, and that's from client to server. I'd propose "A proxy MAY discard a Range header field that contains a range unit it does not understand". Para 5 (p7) " A server that supports range requests ought to ignore or reject a Range header field that consists of more than two overlapping ranges" does "ought to" mean SHOULD? How is the rejection envisaged, a 416? 2. If-Range p5 (v22) doesn't specify what to do if there is an invalid date specified (e.g. not a well formed date / fails parsing). I would propose this is a non-match and therefore range processing is suppressed. Shouldn't there be some warning or something if Range processing is suppressed for various reasons? e.g.: use of weak etag (prohibited) empty If-Range (ignore?) bad date TIA Cheers Adrien
Received on Thursday, 27 June 2013 02:54:07 UTC