Re: Design: Adding ASSOCIATED_ONLY

• From: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
• Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:00:57 -0400
• To: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
• Cc: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <CAOdDvNp29ZuNfNw7YChjGUsj_NDygHcZWQ_fR5MsEYGUucTiEg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com> wrote:

> Thanks for finding that in the SPDY spec! You're right, I totally missed
> reading that line.
>
> I'm happy to wait on adding the flag but I would like to drop the
> requirement that a server close all associated resources.
>

+1.

Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2013 20:01:24 UTC