- From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 17:13:26 -0700
- To: ChanWilliam(陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org, David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>, Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>
- Message-ID: <CABP7RbdsmaKJbPfvOUjZ77MdDH1i0s6_9JFJ=Wk1tfMLRyj2Ew@mail.gmail.com>
+1... consistency makes the most sense. On Jun 15, 2013 5:06 PM, "William Chan (陈智昌)" <willchan@chromium.org> wrote: > I don't particularly care. I just want to point out that the reason it > "natural" to do it the way it's already done, is FINAL and CONTINUES are > the exceptional cases. So to the degree that it's nicer to by default have > no flags set, the current approach is better. I don't have any paint to > waste on this bike shed though. > > On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com> wrote: > >> I agree on the consistency issue Dave presents. I also like Dave's >> suggestion to use 1 to mean final everywhere. >> >> Mike >> >> process question: is it valuable to reply in github? or is the list >> preferred? >> > > Always the list. If you see much discussion on github, yell at them to > bring it to the list. And any commits/issues/updates on github should > reference the rough consensus from the mailing list. > > >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 4:14 PM, David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> This issue: >>> >>> https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/129 >>> >>> describes my concern that the polarity is reversed between STREAM FINAL >>> and HEADER CONTINUES which are both flag bits used to manage >>> continuation. >>> >>> I think this will introduce confusion to folks analyzing wire level bits >>> as well as reading code. >>> >>> I do acknowledge the the current flag names match the sense of the >>> polarity so the names probably should change. >>> >>> Dave Morris >>> >>> >> >
Received on Sunday, 16 June 2013 00:13:53 UTC