- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 08:52:49 +0200
- To: Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2013-06-04 01:04, Zhong Yu wrote: > The question is whether this is a valid HTTP URI: > > http://example.com?query > > According to RFC2616, it is invalid, a slash before the question mark > is mandatory(i.e. http://example.com/?query) > > According to the latest bis draft, it is valid. The draft adopts the > generic URI syntax of RFC, which permits this kind of URI. > > Any reason for this spec change? It seems risky; some old programs may > not be able to accept such URIs. > ... And then, others do. Do you have any evidence of things breaking? In general, I prefer consistency in edge cases like these. Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2013 06:53:20 UTC