Re: Implementation Notes on Server Push

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 5:41 PM, William Chan (陈智昌)
<willchan@chromium.org>wrote:

>
>> Its a particular quandary on mobile. The RTT is certainly costlier.. but
>> storage is costlier too and more importantly to me the data transfer can be
>> exceptionally expensive.
>>
>
> When you say storage, do you mean memory or disk?
>

could be either, or both. depending on deployment.



> What do you think about SETTINGS_MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS vs flow control
> here?
>

deserves experimentation.. though flow control seems more fine grained to
me.


> Also, when you say an established sink, how about the browser cache?
>

For a pretty significant set of deployments I would rather wait 1 rtt than
deal with storage i/o :)