- From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 22:44:16 +0200
- To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- CC: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 15 May 2013 20:44:50 UTC
On 5/14/13 9:25 PM, Roberto Peon wrote: > I don't favor any MUST in the spec about requiring 304s in the first > scenario, but informing people that this is silly would be good :) Typically you only use a MUST on interoperability or security, and not for performance (unless that turns somehow into a security issue, which I don't see here). Eliot
Received on Wednesday, 15 May 2013 20:44:50 UTC