- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 20:44:37 +0000
- To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- cc: ChanWilliam(???) <willchan@chromium.org>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Hasan Khalil <hkhalil@google.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
In message <CABP7RbfBuCtLpR7Y2Zz9o4m2BPLeoz9pwGYjmavx=D8uciKVPg@mail.gmail.com> , James M Snell writes: >--047d7b33cf0ef7a49204dc9f65e6 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > >PHK, can you please clarify what you mean when you say "current proposal". >Do you mean the current spec as a whole or my specific change proposal >re:frame size. I meant the current spec as a whole. I think your specific proposal is an improvement over the other offered alternatives for this specific issue. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 13 May 2013 20:45:00 UTC