- From: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 09:33:53 +0900
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- CC: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Will Chan <willchan@chromium.org>, James Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Hasan Khalil <hkhalil@google.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Hello Poul-Henning, On 2013/05/11 5:27, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message<CAP+FsNd2L3m8i+eTZ+=uHyEaaH08Z0KaTFP2H24RK_avLkenUw@mail.gmail.com> > , Roberto Peon writes: > >> This (lack of a continuation bit) would make it impossible to communicate >> large headers, ones which are successfully transmitted today. > > Too bad: Those demented people will have to stay on HTTP/1.1 then. It's probably true that whoever uses more than 64K of headers today isn't doing a very good job, to say the least. But you said that we should be planning for HTTP/2.0 to last for the next 10 or 20 years. I don't pretend I can predict how reasonable header size will grow over such a time span, but I'm rather sure it will grow. Regards, Martin.
Received on Saturday, 11 May 2013 00:34:53 UTC