- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 19:28:25 +0000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- cc: Hasan Khalil <hkhalil@google.com>, William Chan (???) <willchan@chromium.org>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
In message <CABkgnnWpKqAzQj1NMAF1rWKuzoErHiPKenJUgBvNzpPCx4xfeA@mail.gmail.com> , Martin Thomson writes: >On 10 May 2013 10:58, Hasan Khalil <hkhalil@google.com> wrote: >Yeah, but perhaps you can reserve that hatred for the requests (and >responses) that have so many headers that they are larger than 64K. >Compressed. :) I think we should not have a continuation bit: It will be seldomly used, goes directly to the heart of memory management, it will practically be an invitation for DoS attempts. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Friday, 10 May 2013 19:28:51 UTC