W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: Proposal: New Frame Size Text (was: Re: Design Issue: Frame Size Items)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 10:54:20 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnX=AemYGrBzWGX1VEUgKKrk+hR6YV0jg9qVMSdPiimBAA@mail.gmail.com>
To: William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org>
Cc: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Hasan Khalil <hkhalil@google.com>
On 10 May 2013 10:40, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org> wrote:
> [...] are we going to move forward with the frame
> continuation bit?

I think that this was implicit in our decision to limit frames to
65535 bytes (or less).
Received on Friday, 10 May 2013 18:02:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:11 UTC