- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 20:56:59 +0000
- To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- cc: William Chan (???) <willchan@chromium.org>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <CABP7Rbc8rs4-ktyGKwVxVC4MztcvYtARqBDoyEBYujfcpo4YDw@mail.gmail.com> , James M Snell writes: >Going back through this, here's a counter proposal: > >Let's get rid of the 8192 frame size rule and simply say that the >maximum size for all DATA, HEADERS, HEADERS+PRIORITY and PUSH_PROMISE >frames is either 65,535 or the current flow control WINDOW_SIZE, >whichever is less. Hmm, *now* you're talking... I like it. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2013 20:57:29 UTC