- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 19:32:23 +1000
- To: Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Not sure I understand the question; The Upgrade header likely won't be valid in HTTP/2... On 08/05/2013, at 3:29 PM, Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com> wrote: > On 4/20/13 7:07 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> p1 section 6.7 defines the Upgrade header, but no where does it say anything about relative preference. >> >> Should we define (or at least allow) for the ordering to be semantically significant? It seems to me that if we end up using this, and there are a few different variants of HTTP/2 (e.g., "normal" vs "mobile"), it'd be nice to rely on ordering here. > Mark > do you foresee the possibility HTTP/2 will be (or behave) differently or it is just an example? > > /Sal > > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2013 09:32:54 UTC