- From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 13:31:47 -0700
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Ok, I have a pending push request that addresses these items. On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > On 26 April 2013 11:28, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote: >> One can look at the various frame types and determine which are >> obviously intended for use with streams and which are for the session >> but we need to be clear on exactly what happens when various types of >> frames reference Stream ID #0. >> >> For instance, if a DATA frame reference Stream ID #0, I would say that >> the result MUST be a protocol error. (Likewise with HEADERS frames) > > DATA on stream 0 is an error, we need to make that clear. > >> Likewise, what exactly does it mean for a PING Frame to specify a >> Stream Identifier? Or are all PING Frames required to use Stream ID >> #0? > > PING on non-stream 0 is an error. The problem there is that PING > demands a PONG and you cannot know whether it is possible for the peer > to do that.
Received on Saturday, 27 April 2013 20:32:34 UTC