W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013


From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 16:12:27 +1000
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Lars Eggert <lars@netapp.com>, Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>
Message-Id: <62C9BA5C-1C94-4787-A416-E3359D49EF3B@mnot.net>
To: Martin Stiemerling <Martin.Stiemerling@neclab.eu>

On 26/04/2013, at 7:02 PM, Martin Stiemerling <Martin.Stiemerling@neclab.eu> wrote:

> Hi all,
> I'm joining in late and have to second what Lars and other pointed out on that topic in respect of letting TCP do its job.
> On 04/15/2013 08:04 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>> As for my opinion about what to do: I think we should delete this
>>> TCP congestion window setting from HTTP/2.0.
>>> This is as out of scope as Iíve ever seen at the IETF. Modifying
>>> TCP (by modifying its contract to upper layers such as HTTP, and by
>>> modifying its state machine) is not something that can be done
>>> outside of the Transport Area. Iím cc-ing Lars Eggert and Martin
>>> Stiemerling (former and current Transport ADs), in case they have
>>> additional comments or clarifications.
>> I'd love to hear what Transport folks have to say on-list.
>> I've also been talking with the Martin about having more Transport
>> cross-fertilisation; we're hoping to spend some time on discussing
>> relevant issues in Berlin.
> I wonder if we should have a HTTPbis presentation and discussion of the issue the HTTPbis WG faces to the TCPM group at the IETF in Berlin, sort of a joint session?

Makes sense to me. I'm happy to give some time in the HTTPbis session to this, or we could schedule a separate joint meeting.


Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Saturday, 27 April 2013 06:12:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:10 UTC