- From: 陈智昌 <willchan@chromium.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:49:33 -0700
- To: Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com>
- Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAA4WUYjGaZRVm3NtmT5qO3j7QKNZZiX7zBEV-pDhK0VGGSxuUg@mail.gmail.com>
Yep, but no, it hasn't gone anywhere. On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi William, > > Is this draft by Roberto Peon the one you were referring to? > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rpeon-httpbis-exproxy-00 > > Has this gone anywhere? > > I'm looking to design and build a "trusted proxy" that aligns with the > browser development roadmap/vision in order to provide web acceleration > functionality and so would like to get involved in this process if still > active. > > Thanks, > > Peter > > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 5:57 PM, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org > > wrote: > >> On the contrary, I think it's great to have multiple proposals. If you >> have your own vision for how this should work, please send it out! :) My >> statement was simply an FYI, not a "back off, we've got this!" >> >> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Perfect then I'll sit tight. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 5:43 PM, William Chan (陈智昌) < >>> willchan@chromium.org> wrote: >>> >>>> FYI, we (google spdy team) have been discussing a "trusted proxy" >>>> internally and I think Roberto's got a draft in the works. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Mark, >>>>> >>>>> Earlier this group discussed the idea of a "trusted proxy". Does that >>>>> fall under the HTTP/2.0 category? >>>>> >>>>> I may have some cycles for this. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Peter >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Just a reminder that we're still accepting proposals for: >>>>>> >>>>>> 1. HTTP/2.0 >>>>>> 2. New HTTP authentication schemes >>>>>> >>>>>> As per our charter <http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/charter/>. >>>>>> >>>>>> So far, we've received the following proposals applicable to HTTP/2.0: >>>>>> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/wiki/Http2Proposals> >>>>>> >>>>>> But none yet for authentication schemes: >>>>>> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/wiki/HttpAuthProposals> >>>>>> >>>>>> As communicated in Paris, the deadline for proposals is 15 June, >>>>>> 2012. It's fine if your proposal isn't complete, but we do need to have a >>>>>> good sense of it by then, for discussion. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2013 16:50:04 UTC