W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: what's up with commenting on http/2 github issues

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:33:28 +1000
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <A0383E27-38F8-4399-A12F-C92DB3FE031B@mnot.net>
To: William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org>
On 24/04/2013, at 2:55 PM, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org> wrote:

> I just noticed people are doing this and I'm missing some of the discussions. I'm starring the repo now and chiming in directly there, but I thought we had agreed all the discussions would happen in ietf-http-wg@. What's the plan?

I don't mind if people discuss editorial issues over there, nor is it a problem if they're getting clarification on a point there before taking it to the mailing list (especially since the list distribution is so broad). 

However, design decisions cannot happen over there. Any substantial discussions should be happening on this list, and I have been periodically prodding folks over there to that effect.

My biggest concern with this is that these side discussions will reduce the value of the issue database; the editors and I use it to track what needs doing, and if it becomes overloaded with noise, we can't do our jobs effectively.

If you see someone taking an issue's discussion in that direction, please help me by asking for discussion to be moved to the list (and NOT continuing it in the issue), or notifying me. 

Thanks,

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2013 07:33:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:10 UTC