- From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:09:04 +0200
- To: Felix Geisendörfer <felix@transloadit.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Apr 19, 2013, at 17:13, Felix Geisendörfer <felix@transloadit.com> wrote: > "patch document", How about an application/bytes-at like this: -- Starts with an 8-byte binary unsigned integer (network byte order) giving the position at which these data are to be written -- the data follow Makes you independent from intermediaries bashing headers. (A potential application/append-bytes, without a position, would be bad, because part of your old PUT could still be in a TCP retransmission queue somewhere, creating a race condition.) Grüße, Carsten
Received on Monday, 22 April 2013 08:09:34 UTC