W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: Resumable Uploads

From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 00:02:49 -0500
Message-ID: <CAK3OfOj5XF3dz2-jAfWMdt000dtHm6W7tAvy7P9CKFp7DPta7A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: Felix Geisendörfer <felix@transloadit.com>, Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
On Apr 19, 2013 5:13 PM, "Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 19 April 2013 13:56, Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> wrote:
> > I'd just add that a resumed upload does not necessarily imply a previous
> > upload failure. It could also be that you're appending parts over time
as
> > they "come in" or similar.
>
> I'd have thought that this is a perfect fit for PATCH.  Nothing new
needed.

Sure, but how do you indicate that a transfer is complete?

Nico
--
Received on Saturday, 20 April 2013 05:03:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:10 UTC