W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013

p1: Upgrade ordering (possible HTTP/2 impact)

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 14:07:57 +1000
Message-Id: <B49447FF-CB94-43ED-9CA2-0698C64BB554@mnot.net>
To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
p1 section 6.7 defines the Upgrade header, but no where does it say anything about relative preference.

Should we define (or at least allow) for the ordering to be semantically significant? It seems to me that if we end up using this, and there are a few different variants of HTTP/2 (e.g., "normal" vs "mobile"), it'd be nice to rely on ordering here.


Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Saturday, 20 April 2013 04:08:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:10 UTC