- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 14:07:24 +1000
- To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
P1 sections 2.7.1 and 2.7.2 define the HTTP and HTTPS URI schemes without fragment identifiers. While it's true that HTTP sends these URIs without fragids "on the wire" in the request-target, the schemes *do* allow fragids pretty much everywhere else they're used (including some places in HTTP, e.g., the Location header). Given that this is going to be the definition for these URI schemes, and we already require that the fragid be omitted in the request-target, shouldn't the syntax allow a fragment identifier? -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Saturday, 20 April 2013 04:07:58 UTC