+1
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 08:27:21AM +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> > We can either:
> >
> > - make it a MUST
> > - document what the exceptional circumstances are that cause the SHOULD
> (but I don't think it's that kind of SHOULD)
> > - downgrade it to an "ought to"
> >
> > I do note that we say "generate" there (which I missed before, sorry);
> in our
> > terminology, that means you DON'T need to fix it up when forwarding it;
> it's
> > only when you're actually creating the element that this applies.
>
> Ah OK then I agree with a MUST as well.
>
> +1 then :-)
>
> Willy
>
>