- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:18:22 +1000
- To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
p1 3.2.3 says: > BWS is used where the grammar allows optional whitespace, for > historical reasons, but senders SHOULD NOT generate it in messages; > recipients MUST accept such bad optional whitespace and remove it > before interpreting the field value or forwarding the message > downstream. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-22#section-3.2.3 Throughout our specs, BWS is used at the end of header fields: header-field = field-name ":" OWS field-value BWS and in transfer-codings: transfer-parameter = attribute BWS "=" BWS value and in Expect headers: expectation = expect-name [ BWS "=" BWS expect-value] *( OWS ";" [ OWS expect-param ] ) expect-param = expect-name [ BWS "=" BWS expect-value ] and, finally, in auth-params on challenges and credentials: auth-param = token BWS "=" BWS ( token / quoted-string ) Is this whitespace really "bad" enough to MUST-require that intermediaries (including load balancers and other hardware!) remove it before forwarding the message? Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2013 01:18:48 UTC