- From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 15:27:26 +0200
- To: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
- CC: Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, "Simpson, Robby (GE Energy Management)" <robby.simpson@ge.com>, Robert Collins <robertc@squid-cache.org>, Jitu Padhye <padhye@microsoft.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "Brian Raymor (MS OPEN TECH)" <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>, Rob Trace <Rob.Trace@microsoft.com>, Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@skype.net>, "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>, Martin Stiemerling <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu>
On 4/16/13 3:45 AM, Patrick McManus wrote: > Part of what you inject is traditional L4 information (what was our > CWND before) which is much more interesting than a constant, Much more interesting. That much we agree on. Whether it is information or misinformation is the real question. Eliot
Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2013 13:28:16 UTC