- From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 13:17:30 -0500
- To: "Tiffany B. Brown" <tiffanyb@opera.com>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 7 November 2012 13:04, Tiffany B. Brown <tiffanyb@opera.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > I've recently submitted an RFC for a new HTTP header: Device-Stock-UA. > Feedback is welcome. > > http://www.ietf.org/staging/draft-brown-device-stock-ua-00.txt It isn't at all clear to me that this solves the problem: - the stock services may have been changed. just because a browser comes with a device by default doesn't mean it wasn't removed. - the capabilities of the third party browser may differ from the capabilities of the stock browser - user agent shouldn't be use for capability detection in the first place - what does the (stock) user agent string have to do with "other software that may be running in addition to the user agent"? -- Eitan Adler
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2012 18:18:28 UTC