Re: Last Call: <draft-snell-http-prefer-14.txt> (Prefer Header for HTTP) to Proposed Standard from Julian Reschke on 2012-10-26 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from October to December 2012)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:21:28 +0200
To: ietf@ietf.org
CC: SM <sm@resistor.net>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Message-ID: <508A8048.4010007@gmx.de>

On 2012-10-05 17:12, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> see below for my (mostly editorial) feedback:

I note that there was no reply to this mail, and at least one problem is 
still present in the latest draft...:

> 2.2.  Examples
>
>     The following examples illustrate the use of various preferences
>     defined by this specification, as well as undefined extensions for
>     strictly illustrative purposes:
>
>     1.  Return a "202 Accepted" response for asynchronous processing if
>     the response cannot be processed within 10 seconds.  An undefined
>     "priority" preference is also specified:
>
>       Prefer: return-asynch, wait=10;
>       Prefer: priority=5;
>
> Shouldn't that be:
>
>       Prefer: return-asynch; wait=10
>       Prefer: priority=5
>
> ???

Best regards, Julian

Received on Friday, 26 October 2012 12:21:59 UTC