- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:09:35 +0200
- To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
On 2012-10-26 10:47, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2012-10-24 17:51, James M Snell wrote:
>> FYI... a new version of the HTTP Prefer header draft has been published
>> based on all of the excellent last call feedback received.
>>
>> There are several significant changes, all driven by received feedback...
>> ...
>
> So I think there should be another LC, optimally after we are done with
> the HTTPbis WGLCs.
So I hear this was approved in the meantime without another round of
review. This is bad.
For instance, the newly introduced Preference-Applied header field is
defined as:
Preference-Applied = "Preference-Applied" ":" 1#token
and has the example:
Response:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: application/json
Preference-Applied: return=representation
Content-Location: /my-document
{"a": 1}
But the "token" ABNF production doesn't include "=".
There may be more problems like these. Please go back to LC.
Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 26 October 2012 12:12:01 UTC