- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:09:35 +0200
- To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
On 2012-10-26 10:47, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2012-10-24 17:51, James M Snell wrote: >> FYI... a new version of the HTTP Prefer header draft has been published >> based on all of the excellent last call feedback received. >> >> There are several significant changes, all driven by received feedback... >> ... > > So I think there should be another LC, optimally after we are done with > the HTTPbis WGLCs. So I hear this was approved in the meantime without another round of review. This is bad. For instance, the newly introduced Preference-Applied header field is defined as: Preference-Applied = "Preference-Applied" ":" 1#token and has the example: Response: HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Type: application/json Preference-Applied: return=representation Content-Location: /my-document {"a": 1} But the "token" ABNF production doesn't include "=". There may be more problems like these. Please go back to LC. Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 26 October 2012 12:12:01 UTC