- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:50:53 +1100
- To: nathan@webr3.org
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
They're purposefully different; 204 (along with 304 an 1xx) are grandfathered in as special cases from RFC2616 and predecessors. Cheers, On 22/10/2012, at 8:04 AM, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: > From p2-semantics, v21: > > The 204 response MUST NOT include a message body, and thus is always > terminated by the first empty line after the header fields. > > ... > > 7.3.6. 205 Reset Content > > The message body included with the response MUST be empty. Note that > receivers still need to parse the response according to the algorithm > defined in Section 3.3 of [Part1]. > > Are both bits of text trying to say the same thing, should they use the same text? > > Best, > > Nathan > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 22 October 2012 04:51:28 UTC