- From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 16:36:11 +1300
- To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
While reviewing the clauses for cacheability I find an undefined case which can reasonably be expected to appear in real-world traffic. Comparing p6 section 7.2.2.3 and 7.2.2.5 it is clear that response Cache-Control "no-cache" with no values is semantically equivalent to "must-revalidate, max-age=0". p7 section 4.1 clause 2 states that responses with "must-revalidate" MAY be cached for use on later requests provided revalidation is done. Assuming that p7 clause is true, I see no reason why "no-cache" response control cannot be also added to p7 section 4.1 list of exceptions along with must-revalidate. Amos
Received on Sunday, 14 October 2012 03:36:47 UTC