- From: Jeroen de Borst <J.deBorst@F5.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 04:02:16 +0000
- To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2012 04:02:48 UTC
This is very similar to what was done in WAP (WSP 1.x specifically). See section 8.4 in http://www.wapforum.org/tech/documents/WAP-203-WSP-20000504-a.pdf Does this have to be re-invented? Are there significant benefits? Thanks, Jeroen From: James M Snell [mailto:jasnell@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 10:08 AM To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org Subject: Updated Binary Optimized Header Encoding Draft FYI.. I have submitted an updated draft for the proposed Binary Optimized Header Encoding mechanism for the http2 effort. http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-snell-httpbis-bohe-01.txt A number of fairly significant changes have been made: 1. The codepage identifier for registered header tokens has been removed. 2. The Per-header flags field has been removed and replaced with specific individual bits to indicate character-based values and multiple values 3. Value lengths have been increased from max 16-bit length to a max 22-bit length. The encoding itself remains just as compact with these changes. With the http version header field, for example, requiring no more than 6 uncompressed bytes to represent. As always, feedback is more than welcome. - James
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2012 04:02:48 UTC